Teknik perang yang BN guna untuk menang PRU - Petua panglima perang hebat

Saturday, 8 September 2012

BN tak pernah kalah dalam peperangan PRU di negara kita. Secara logiknya mereka tentu ada amalkan teori perang dari buku Sun Zhu's Art of War. Buku itu merumuskan falsafah:

"kenali diri anda, kenali musuh anda, dalam 100 pertempuran anda tak akan kalah!"

Setakat ini perang PRU belum lagi mencapai 100 kali, tapi kalau nak dikira dari segi peratusan mereka telah menang 100%. Maknanya mereka tentu ada mengamalkan falsafah hebat yang dipelajari dari para jeneral perang hebat yang ada di seluruh dunia dalam sejarah.

Apakah falsafah perang yang diguna pakai oleh para jeneral hebat tersebut:


  1. Jangan serang pada tempat yang musuh cukup bersedia. BN atau Umno tak pernah suka menyahut cabaran pembangkang untuk berceramah atau berdebat. Tak ada parti yang lebih bersedia untuk berceramah selain daripada pembangkang di negara kita ini. Lawan hujah atau lawan pidato alamat cari nahas bagi Umno. Lihat mereka dari BN/Umno yang cuba-cuba lakukan perkara tersebut. Hampir kesemuanya kena titik habis.
  2. Sentiasa menyerang dari berbagai sudut. BN/Umno tak pernah kering idea menyerang pembangkang dari pelbagai sudut. Mereka ada kelebihan gunakan kesemua media popular yang dikuasai kerajaan untuk itu. Serangan pula pada sudut lemah pakatan pembangkang seperti mana yang dinyatakan pada prinsip pertama di atas.
  3. Jangan tumpu pada perlawanan, berikan tumpuan pada matlamat akhir. Dengan itu anda mungkin tak perlu bertempur lansung untuk menang. BN/Umno tak kisah pada pertempuran ketika PRU, mereka lebih kisah pada matlamat menguasai kerajaan persekutuan. Segala usaha dilakukan seperti ubah pengundi, ubah sempadan, beli calon, pujuk calon bebas dan lain-lain. Biar sesetengah medan mereka kalah teruk, asalkan kerajaan persekutuan mereka kuasai. Kadang-kadang menang tak bertandingpun.

BN/Umno memang berpengalaman luas untuk menang perang PRU. Mereka tak pernah kisah jika dianggap pondan bila ketua mereka tolak berdebat dengan ketua pembangkang. Tak ada jeneral hebat yang cari penyakit untuk serang secara berdepan di mana kedudukan musuh terlalu bersedia.

Apakah semua itu akan terbalik pada PRU-13 nanti dan BN/Umno jadi pembangkang pulak? jika itu terjadi Malaysia akan menyaksikan kemunculan seorang lagi jeneral perang hebat dalam sejarah dunia...mungkin jeneral itu adalah Anwar Ibrahim?

Strategi di atas di petik dari sini.
Share on :

2 comments:

  1. general reject dan pengamal rasuah macam bekas bos dia... poorah nak perubahan kalau muka sama jugak yang dok ada...

    ReplyDelete
  2. TOKZ commented in blog of Rockybru:
    "Is there a need for DEBATES after DEBATES???" & if you want 9 ANSWERS...herewith would be the answers:

    1) NO! becos politicians should be seen doing work for 'the rakyat' & NOT appear on stages, TV & radio to entertain 'the rakyat'. Politics is NOT Bollywood or Hollywood.

    2) NO! becos debates bring NO winners, debates brings NO changes & debates brings NO purpose. It only bring childish behaviour out of politicians as to show who is more daring & who would chicken out. How childish!

    3) NO! becos DAP would be the 1st party to always participate as they are filled with abundance of people who only know how to talk, talk, talk & talk but when it comes to walking their talk....one would easily find them on their bed sleeping or underneath their bed hiding.

    4) NO! it's waste of TV space. I would rather watch better shows instead of watching goon heads trying to show who can speak better. I rather have a 'wakil rakyat' who put the talk into walk instead of telling fairy tales. One good example of a fairy story teller is none other than ANWAR IBRAHIM.

    5) NO! becos after several debates held, there isn't any WINNER at all. All we have are just BIG LOSERS. They always debate 'OUT OF TOPIC' by inserting their own agenda/propaganda.

    6) NO! becos the supporters of the debate participants always behave like HOOLIGANS. They give the country a bad image. Even terrorists behave much better than them.

    7) NO! becos Malaysians politicians are all UGLY. I won't get spooked by horror movies but I sure do get spooked by local politicians sight & sound.

    8) NO! becos debates only make a politicians look more stupid (BTW, they are stupid enough now). The more debates held, the more these 'bodoh punya' politicians will think debates will earn them votes. Do they think the voters are blind & as stupid as them? The voters are able to see who is working, who is sleeping & who is only known for talking.

    9) NO! becos "TALKING IS CHEAP". People who talk less are often good workers, while, talkative people are filled with BULLSHIT but with NO substance. When NAJIB snub ANWAR for debate, I instantly knew NAJIB is a worker rather than talker. As for ANWAR, he's a rubbish vending machine becos he always give millions of excuses whenever he fails to walk his talk. I suspect ANWAR had been deprived of media attention while he was in prison & this is why he's all out now trying to make up for the deprived times.

    http://www.rockybru.com.my/2012/09/9soalan-di-tv-sembilan.html

    ReplyDelete

 
Copyright © 2015. ABU.
Design by Herdiansyah Hamzah. Published by Themes Paper. Powered by Blogger.
Creative Commons License